Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Chickens
My sister and brother-in-law just installed a clutch (herd? flock?) of chickens on their 20 acre patch in upstate New York. My next door neighbors did the same on their half acre a couple of months ago. The putative reason is that chickens produce eggs and eggs feed the family. Unfortunately, neither my sibling's birds nor my neighbor's birds have produced so much as an empty shell. Is this some kind of hoax? Not so, says none other than The Economist. Not only is it for real, but it is actually a "craze." (Read about it here: http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13856313). So, why doesn't Rural Ways keep chickens? For the same reason that we don't keep a horse, a dog, a cow, or a goat: Animals require care . . . all the time . . . even on the weekends. Because our weekends, and even our weeks, are often spent traveling away from The Homestead, it doesn't make sense.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Electrical Outlets
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg8mk6Tb-yCs6CwiZWVzqeXjDEHtFTJlEIBYEHl477gBZ06vMjiekDpNXJbbtqZs3ESSFQSzrLoJnxTVjykArgYCY1d6EEhCnvB0-VmPXj0eCLya1MKIjKMzr0vZ_02jGpiDr2_gz6PwMfz/s400/plugs.jpg)
Monday, July 27, 2009
Cash for Clunkers
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjEhC2DBa7fKoqA6qwL0kwkl9d_pkxvrOEd32mdbj8ViBmtMnts6vBJeQdh-QPXUPVUJHAQGP_hHtbjfOU5WHz40An2LnHCvhQNbLRJsnoHF57a0zHxxqScx2OwVMrB1YpiBiwsrksd1lzf/s400/chev.jpg)
Of course, even if one of our vehicles did qualify, we would want to trade it in for a "used" car since that is where the long term value is. But, no, the money is only available to purchase a new vehicle. The "economic" reasoning behind this part of the program is that it doesn't help Detroit to have people buying used cars.
Obviously, the cash for clunkers program is a clunker. First, it makes little environmental sense to encourage people to buy new cars. Sure, they may be marginally more fuel efficient, but the manufacturing process requires incredible inputs of energy, nickel, steel, cadmium, lithium, plastic, and etc. This is totally un-accounted for and cannot possibly be justified when compared to the long-term maintenance and preservation of existing vehicles. Second, it makes little economic sense for most families to pay the premiums associated with new vehicles. A used vehicle would likely provide equal transportation for half the cost and a new vehicle would likely come with a usurious interest rate that can scarcely be afforded by the average family.
Saturday, July 18, 2009
Picking Everyday
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjK9GQV076qZPEoqgkkf2uNs67mPfd_guuTS0dPGfMZgozq8TS9cxxqLVgmDYoYe9IFBq-7vh3EBLqyM2aY1aM77mtea01KJbh6oDSUlj6uKCOP_DTsVJt3BIWPADlFMq2ZU5a4Rhb85XVJ/s400/produce.jpg)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)